There have been a few comments on the thread back home. Here they are:
hawk wrote on Jul 13, 2009 5:30 PM:
shimko42 wrote on Jul 13, 2009 8:30 PM:
johlsson wrote on Jul 14, 2009 7:07 AM:
She’s presenting as fact, attributes to atheists that we most certainly do not have. I pointed it out.
I was wondering how long it would take before Sally’s bulldogs started barking, metaphorically.
Sally gets no free ride to spew whatever she wants without criticism, regardless of her age or sex.
Now, did you have something to add about the content of either her or my posts?
Hawk, I’m with you on the missionary subject. Culture-erasers. “
listner wrote on Jul 14, 2009 4:49 PM:
I enjoy your posts. Well thought out and logical.
It matters not if the author is a little old lady. Once she decides to place these types of letters in the paper, she must expect some reaction from those that may not share her beliefs. Consider, however, the wonder that after all these years, the free exercise of one’s own religion coupled with our right to express our own opinions, is still a cherished liberty in this country. I may dislike the religious right ( or any religous zealot who believes they have a monopoly on truth )and the effects I precieve they have had on this countries policies, but I’ll defend their right to speak, whether it be enlighten or nonsense.
Your opinion is just as valuable as hers! Don’t shy away from good arguement! “
johlsson wrote on Jul 15, 2009 11:18 AM:
Thank you for the compliment.
I have given much consideration to the first amendment rights we enjoy. Stunning foresight on the framers of the constitution, I’d agree.
Sadly, there remain some who would deny people who disagree with their beliefs that right. Down that path lies madness.
Bien a vous de Belgique. “
thetech wrote on Jul 15, 2009 9:35 PM:
The “other”; is too narrow, for the likes of you……………………….. “
Jesse Ohlsson wrote on Jul 16, 2009 1:21 PM:
The difference between you and Sally is she far more closely lives the convictions of her beliefs. You, on the other hand, epitomize the hypocritical christian. Your hatred for me isn’t even thinly veiled.
Convenient, how you pick and choose the bits of your religion that agree with you, isn’t it? You do not help your cause. “
Jason McQueen wrote on Jul 20, 2009 9:32 AM:
Even though I am a Christian I have had a few athiest friends, many very intelligent and articulate people. I understand their motivation: they are simply unwilling to yield control of their lives to another higher power. They want to be their own boss. Even as a minister of the gospel, there is nothing more I can do in that case (except pray for them); they are free to go and do as they will. God Himself allows them the freedom to choose Him or not and I can do no more or less on His behalf.
The Bible says that the first step of faith is to believe that God is, and that He will reward those who diligently seek Him. Without that belief, nothing else in the Book will seem relevant.
Aside from that, as an American, I will tolerate the preaching of any god or belief, so long as I am also allowed to preach mine. I understand that not everything I would hear as free speech will be pleasing to me, since obviously the world does not revolve around me. I would, however, ask the same understanding of others.
You may or may not be interested to know that I also do not support school-led prayer, as I would not trust any modern school administrator to properly lead my children before God’s Throne; I can do that myself. “
nokomis wrote on Jul 20, 2009 12:57 PM:
adnilabuc wrote on Jul 22, 2009 9:00 PM:
Most Gods are the same as each other. To not see that is like the blind men who argue over whether the elephant is a leg, a trunck or a belly. “
Jesse Ohlsson wrote on Jul 25, 2009 2:11 AM:
Indeed, I’d take what you said and expand it to: All gods are the same as each other… and all equally fictional.
A remarkably important point that theists tend to ignore.
As for your charge of me being a moral busybody, perhaps you can quote where I am suggesting ANY particular moral direction people should take. I’m working on the assumption here that a moral busybody is one who tries to tell others how to act morally. If your definition includes questioning others’ moral codes, climb on into the pot, for now you are doing the same by criticizing mine.
You’re normally much better at this. Is it that you have no substantive argument today, and just had to resort to calling me a name? “
Summary:
No one EVER actually responds to the points I make. Oh, as we can see, they don’t like to see me pick on Sally, or their favorite sky pixie. This doesn’t surprise me much. More on why that is in the next post…

0 comments ↓
There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.
Leave a Comment