Entries from May 2009 ↓

Who’s a cynic?

I was reading another article in my hometown newspaper today, this one about a Christian youth organization in northern Wisconsin calling itself BAYNET (Bay Area Youth Network).  The bay they claim is called Chequamegon Bay on Lake Superior.

On it’s face, this group sounds like they actually do something of value in the community.  So, what’s the harm, eh?  Probably not much.  There were a couple of quotes that raised my ire.

The first quote is the one that speaks to my title for this post.  The BAYNET founder and leader, Joe Mousseau, “a native of Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada, had originally come to the bay area in 1997 as an intern with Washburn Assembly of God while a student at North Central University in Minneapolis, working on a theology degree.”  In the previous paragraph, Joe says:  ”I came here with the goal of working with students. I’ve always wanted to work with them; it’s always been a dream of mine.” 

Motive and means.  Get ‘em while they’re young, vulnerable, and a teen.  That’s a hell of a confusing time in life.  There could hardly be a better time to indoctrinate kids.  That’s the cynic in me.  I don’t doubt Joe really means well for the kids who participate in his program.  I also don’t doubt that Joe wouldn’t lose a lot of sleep if a few happened to join his church on the way.

The first hit on google for the definition of cynical is:   …”believing the worst of human nature and motives; having a sneering disbelief in e.g. selflessness of others”  My wife says “That’s you.”.

The second quote that drew my ire is this:  Joe says:  ”We want to give students options, to stay away from at-risk activities like promiscuity, alcohol and drugs.”  Then, a couple paragraphs later:  ”…it is a fact that kids who have some kind of a faith system in their life are less likely to engage in those at-risk activities.”  What?  Of course he means “…less likely than kids without some kind of faith system in their lives”.  He makes this statement of fact without citing any references.  As I write this, I have no sources to dispute his “fact”.  I’ll dig that up soon and post a follow up.

The article also goes on to say that “in recent graduating classes at Ashland and Washburn high schools, …five out of six valedictorians were members of BAYNET.” as was a local Teenager of the Year.  Confusing correlation with causation?

But again, the cynical side of me tells me Joe is making up this fact to justify a wee bit of proselytizing.  Say it isn’t so, Joe.

Anti-vax! What the hell?

Last week, in conversation with a colleague, I found their young son was home with chicken pox.  I remember having it myself, though I didn’t think it was all that itchy.  I don’t remember significant discomfort.  I was glad that my boys don’t even have that concern, they’ve been immunized against it.

I am re-posting this article by Elyse Anders from Skepchick.org on the subject (with permission).  It’s very well written and I agree with all of it.

“An Open Letter to Frightened Parents

May 23rd, 2009 by Elyse

No GravatarDear Parents, 

If you have not made the decision to vaccinate your child, I urge you to make that decision now. Immunity from painful, disfiguring, and sometimes even deadly diseases is not a gift you should withhold from your child. Your child is, undoubtedly, the greatest love of your life… a love so great that it was unfathomable until you experienced it. And I know that you want to and need to do everything in your power to protect him or her. Which is precisely why you’re hesitant to vaccinate.

I understand. As parents, we all understand. Vaccines have received almost nothing but bad press over the last few years. Even the good press seems to come with all kinds of asterisks and disclaimers. But let me remind you of something: the press is not concerned with accuracy, they are concerned with readership. Sensationalistic and scary stories grab readers’ attention. It’s why your evening news begins with murders, shots fired, child abductions and fatal car accidents. That’s not to say scary always means untrue, but it should be treated with a healthy dose of skepticism… in fact, even the non-scary stuff needs to have an eyebrow raised to it.

I know you don’t think you can trust “Big Pharma”. I’m not going to pretend that medicine has never failed us as or that mistakes have never been made or even that risks are never taken in the interest of profit. Your lack of trust isn’t unjustified. But try to understand that Big Pharma is not a machine of evil men, single men, who were all bred from test tubes and never experienced love or family. “Big Pharma” is an industry, fueled by people who need medicine. And it’s run by people who need medicine. People with families – children, parents, husbands and wives. The investors and shareholders are parents, just like you and me. These are not people segregated from human interaction. They are not out to get you. They are not out to hurt you. It’s not a perfect system. It’s flawed in many ways, but it’s the system we have. And it does more good than harm every day.

When you hear people like Jenny McCarthy saying things like, “If you think about it, it’s all about greed”, ask yourself who she’s talking about. Thousands of people are involved in the approval and distribution of each and every drug. Every one of them stands to be hurt personally and professionally by the failures of those drugs. Yes, profits will be made, but unless/until we are willing to sacrifice the freedoms afforded to us by capitalism, businesses cannot run without profit… for better or worse.

It’s scary to trust a seemingly faceless billion-dollar industry with the health and well-being of your child. You’ve met children with autism. You’ve met their parents. Yet you’ve never met a single person who develops, researches or approves drugs.

It’s easy to sympathize with the anti-vaccine movement when you see these children and you don’t want to make the same mistakes that their parents made. You never want your child to experience that hell. You want your child to smile and say “Mama” and “Daddy”.

The thing is, as convincing as these parents are, and as sincere as they are, their blame is misplaced. It’s hard to look at a friend or relative -  someone you care about deeply, hurting and struggling and knowing how their child was injured – and tell them that perhaps they are making unfounded accusations, that maybe their pain is causing them to place blame where there might not be any. Perhaps they want answers so badly that they’re willing to accept the answers that are given, instead of being able to accept that there may not be any answers at all right now.

It’s all understandable. Having an answer, having a culprit, having someone to direct your rage at, someone to blame, someone to rally against, to point your finger at and say, “How dare you hurt my child!” It feels more right than sitting back, and having to wrap your mind around the fact that this might just be the way your child is. Accepting that there is no answer feels like accepting defeat. There is a hopelessness and helplessness about it. No doubt.

But the fact is that, as much as we all want a better more ethical health care industry for our families, they may not be to blame on this one. And it’s not that researchers haven’t tried to nail the pharmaceutical industry on the vaccine issue. Indeed, they have tried. But when they investigate the claims of the dangers of vaccines, the results are clear: vaccines do not cause autism and getting vaccinated is far safer than not.

I’m sure there’s nothing I can say to defend “Big Pharma” and the government that will convince you to change your mind. But let me make one personal plea to you.

You may think that your decision not to vaccinate is a personal one. That it’s not my business. That it’s between you and your family members because you are the ones affected by the decision and no one else is.

But that’s not the case.

I’ve heard parents argue that the risk of polio is only 1 in 1500, while autism risk is 1 in 150. That’s a scary statistic. But understand that the only reason the risk of polio is so low is because of vaccines. Each time a person with a healthy immune system chooses not to get vaccinated, it chips away at that number. Each unvaccinated person puts more people at risk.

When you make the decision not to vaccinate, or even just to hold off for a while, you’re not just making that decision for your children and your family. You are making that decision for all of us. Your child’s vaccines don’t just protect them from disease, they protect everyone around them by preventing the spread of disease.

By not vaccinating, you affect everyone you come into contact with. You affect the pregnant woman in line behind you at the grocery store. You affect your elderly relatives. You affect people with HIV and AIDS. You affect people with cancer. You affect newborn babies. You affect the people who cannot receive vaccines. You affect the children whose parents have chosen not to vaccinate them. You affect yourself. You affect your neighbors. You affect every single person you meet every time you meet them and all the people they meet after you. That’s not an exaggeration.

While something like measles may seem like nothing more than an unpleasant childhood illness to your otherwise healthy child, it can be a death sentence for a child with a compromised immune system. What may cost your child a few days off from school, could cost a little girl with leukemia her life. Maybe you don’t know anyone with leukemia, but once that disease is out there, spreading, there’s nothing you personally can do to stop it.

But you can stop it now. You can do your part to make sure these diseases don’t spread. All you have to do is vaccinate. It saves lives.

And you don’t know what fate holds for your children. One day, one of your own children could be one of those with a compromised immune system. If that were to happen, your child’s life could be at the mercy of herd immunity, a protection that is vanishing with this current vaccination hysteria.

I know you want to do the best thing for your child. As a parent, I understand your fear.

When it came time for my son to get his 18 month shots, I suddenly found myself doubting. I am 100% pro vaccination, but I wondered what would happen if I were wrong. And that question kept me up, sickened at the thought that I might hurt my son. But I would not let myself be overcome by fear. The rational part of me packed him up, put him in the car, and drove him to that appointment to get him his MMR. And I don’t regret that decision. And today, three and a half months later, he is still smiling, hugging me and calling me Mama. But even if he weren’t, I would be glad I vaccinated him.

If the statistic that 1 in 150 children scares you, and you still believe that vaccines can be linked to autism, please think of it this way – even if 1 in every 150 children who gets vaccinated becomes autistic, that risk is only 0.667%. That means that 99.333% of the time, autism does not happen. Research has repeatedly debunked the link between vaccines and autism, but even if that research is wrong, the risk is two thirds of a percent.

That’s a risk worth taking.

Please, call your pediatrician or family doctor today and get your child an appointment to be immunized. The world is counting on you.

Sincerely,

Elyse Anders”

I just don’t have the writing skill to put things that eloquently.  I can imagine one of my worst nightmares would be to bury one of my sons for something I could have prevented.  It’ll be a cold day in the hell I don’t believe in before that happens.

Ghosthunters, my shiny metal ass (to quote Bender).

My hobby of pissing off the locals in my hometown newspaper has again yielded fruit.  The latest article that spun me up is this one:  Ghost-hunting Team hits Ashland Hotel.  Long story short:  Employees of a 20 year old hotel, the Hotel Chequamegon, on the shores of Lake Superior in Ashland, Wisconsin can’t explain some bumps in the night.  It must be ghosts.  Call the ghost “experts” from Minneapolis, Team PROPHET.  Get publicity for free.

Yeah. That’ll do the trick.

I was most amused by the scientific instruments they bring to the “investigation”.  Even more amusing are the explanations for their uses on their website.

Trash journalism popularizing woo.

Two classic arguments in support of the woo from the discussion thread:

1.  What’s the harm?

and

2.  There’s a wiki article quoted saying god is also a ghost, so therefore ghosts must be real, too.

I ran into a YouTube video of Penn Jillette discussing the website www.whatstheharm.net, so I went and had a look.  Like I needed more examples.

Fuck!  This penchant for woo and lack of critical thinking will be the end of us all if we’re not careful.

But, the two guys arguing that god is a ghost, therefore ghosts must exist was pure gold.  One of them actually asked me at one point if, since I didn’t believe in ghosts, I also didn’t believe in god.  He must not be a regular reader.

Smoking is full of shit

In my hometown newspaper’s online edition opinions page, there are any number of topics of interest to a small town.  One that has showed up a few times in recent weeks is about attempts to ban smoking in  bars and restaurants in Wisconsin.  I can’t seem to find any actual proposed legislation, though.

There are a few tired arguments that always, always, always rear their ugly heads.  1.  The guv’mint can’t tell us what to do on our private property.  2.  We have a “right to smoke”.  3.  If you don’t like the smoke, don’t go to bars.

I wonder if I’m wrong, but here are my answers to those three arguments.

1.  Of course the guv’mint can, and does, tell you what you can and can’t do on your own private property.  Try building without a permit, or not following building codes.  See how far you get draining wetlands on your own property.  The list goes on and on…

2.  I don’t think so.  This seems to be in the same boat as alcohol or heroin for that matter.  Do you have a “right” to use cocaine?  Maybe, maybe not.  I think probably not.

3.  Since when do these tiny minded smokers seem to think they get to name the genre of establishments they choose to infest to make this argument?  What’s to stop the smokers from deciding to hang out in bowling alleys instead of bars, then tell the rest of us “If you don’t like the smoke, don’t go bowling!”  Bullshit.

I read one of the best defenses for smoking I’ve heard so far recently.  One of the local dumbasses actually said he used to smoke because of his “persuit of happiness”.  What a load of shit.  What better way to show your agreement and support of the Declaration of Independence than to take up smoking?

I quit smoking ten years ago.  I started by experimenting with it with friends, then in the usual VERY short amount of time, was addicted.  I quit seriously three times.  The first two times, I “un”quit by just having one here and there after not touching one for over a year.  It takes even less time to become addicted again at that point.  No, I am quite certain the only way to stay smoke free is to really not have one again.  Ever.

Pity.  I sure enjoyed a good cigar.  And in Europe, I can get the good ones. But, they’re more expensive than drugs.

Anyone else fool around with tobacco and finally quit?  How many times did you try?

One more question.  Can anyone think of a single socially beneficial thing to come from tobacco and its use?